Ironic

Something that has probably been questioned by people who are endowed with a modicum of critical thinking.

When did vaccination status override testing negative for covid? Personally, I would be more comfortable with people who tested negative rather than positive, regardless of if they are vaccinated or not.

The data and media reports of how vaccinated people can get and transmit the virus is somehow overridden by the hype of the vax vs anti-vax dialogue which is replete with hyperbole, vitriol, and subjective views which range from the reasonable to the outrageous.

There was a news article (Daily Mail) of some woman having a wedding and wanting to isolate the unvaccinated at a separate table to reduce the risk of exposure from the virus.

Using simple logic this is flawed as the “science” admits that despite vaccination you can contract and transmit the virus. So, what the hell does isolating people based on vaccination status provide anything but an imagined perception of being protected from the virus.

Extrapolating this premise means that jabbed are safe and un-jabbed are unsafe regardless of if they have the virus or not. Regardless of which “camp” you reside in it simply makes no sense as you cannot spread a virus if you don’t have it, and the reverse is true.

Simple logic dictates that a negative test would be more appropriate, yet this is largely ignored in the hype of the times as promoted by media and politicians who want to keep the dream alive as it suits their stance.

Basically, it is segregation based on fear and not logic.

Politicians and media have a lot to answer for as they pursue their own agendas bereft of simple logic and instead based in hyperbole and fear.

The argument that the unvaccinated are the threat is diminished when you look at the available data as the vaccinated, as well as the unvaccinated, are now spreading the variants due entirely to the rules exercised by multiple governments globally. Explain this if you will. How can a person who is healthy, with no virus, can be a threat to your health regardless of vaccination status? The rule of diminishing returns can be used in this instance as logic overrides perception.

To use an old phrase; “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark” rings true as it describes a corruption or a situation when something is wrong.

The detractor’s argument of vaccinations make you safe, yet the premise remains that if you are safe then why would you be in fear of unvaccinated folk if you are “
protected”? Surely your vaccination status would be protection enough if the official doctrine is sufficient. Then those evil unvaccinated scum would be beneath you and destined to die a horrible and painful death, and you will have productive and enlightened life because you are jabbed. It makes no sense despite that people are acting irrationally due entirely to messaging aimed at this division.

Perhaps I may be missing something in the debate, yet the argument of protection falls short when inspected. Protection is subjective given available data and personal opinion over available information and common-sense seems to be the new normal. The recent spread of Omicron currently seems to be the great hope for managing this virus as it is more transmissable yet less lethal. Despite this data slowly coming out the push for more and more booster shots is concerning as the messaging on vaccinces is that they fall dramatically in efficacy after 8 to 10 weeks so you need to get boosters. It seems that politicians globally are determined to keep the pandemic alive regardless of the cost to humanity.

Perhaps it is due to me being an Asperger who thinks differently to many people and view thing differently.